Some people correctly called out the Social Justice Warrior assholes out on the Breaking Bad board. And you know that Whatlarks was going to jump all over that! The opportunities Larks finds to jump on anyone's back is all Larks' life is all about.
After berating and being a complete moronic fool to one of the commenters on the topic, Larks then jumps at the chance to attack yet another sound and logical argument put forth by another commenter. Of course Larks is already swinging the ugliness and attitude around with constant name-calling, abuse and illogical and downright nonsensical replies but Larks is showing how much of a monster Larks truly is.
When one called Larks out on its babbling, incoherent spewing, without once using name-calling or lowly tactics, Larks comes back with... you guessed it! Insults and name-calling because Larks just can't debate or argue with anyone calling that insidious troll out!
What's more is that Lark has the audacity to call others divisive and insincere when Larks embodies those traits right off the bat. And this troll isn't just indignant about being called out as a pissy SJW, Larks is stomping around having a meltdown and showing how insecure Larks really is in its lonely little life while making such a fuss over another user pointing out how these Social Justice Warriors online sit and judge from their couch, trolling the site. And futhermore it is these same SJW's who ARE the EXTREME FRINGE of the fanbase! Not the ones who hate Skyler! Larks is in the extreme fringe while trying desperately to pass everyone else off as such! That other user had it right! Larks loses it.
No, the real purpose of the SJW label is to mock those for their
insincerity and self-importance, for if these people genuinely cared
about discrimination and inequality, they'd be out in the world fighting
legitimate injustices rather than impotently trolling from their well
worn sofas.
Those words so true and hits Larks hard!
Larks is the one who repeats itself with a "cluster of fallacies and mischaracterizations." Larks is the one doing all the labeling and judgement of anyone who ventures into the boards at IMDb who doesn't have the same lack of intelligence and the same wrath against Walt (or other TV characters Larks hates) that Larks has.
All Larks does is name-call, insult, divide, cling to like-minded bigots like itself, troll and show what a loser it is. Larks replies to that user is pathetic because anyone who's in the know, knows that Larks is the one who sits and judges people. Daily. Larks is not out fighting real injustices in the world. Larks is on IMDb, 10-13 hours a day. Don't believe me? Check its posts. And it's not just the Breaking Bad board Larks is a trolling disgusting scourge on, Larks trolls across the entire site! How's that for divisive? Hostility is Larks' middle name.
Larks' idea of harmony is if everyone were just as miserable, pathetic, narrow-minded and bigoted as he/she is! If everyone would just agree with that piece of shit, then Larks wouldn't insult you. Well, no actually, Larks would still insult you. It doesn't get off any other way. There's nothing to be gained if you're not a cheerleading thundercunt and then maybe Larks will spare you some of its more scathing hateful flaming. But don't count on it.
If you're a normal person. Have a life, and decide to comment on any show Larks has taken full time residence on in the way of IMDb boards and believe me, sitting in front of a TV is Larks' life - Larks will lash forth with all the wrath, abuse and bullying you'll ever encounter. And Larks will do so in huge walls of text and psychobabble.
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Anna Gunn is an Egomaniac
That article she wrote wasn't just to some men who hated her character, but to ALL fans who hated her character. Of course the IMDb troll known as Whatlarks still tries to make excuses for that pathetic actress who is just as insecure, vain and full of narcissistic rage as she is!
Anna Gunn's ridiculous Op-Ed was nothing more than a hilarious attempt to try to fool an audience who do make up the majority (yes, MAJORITY) of fans who hated the control freaking, one-dimensional spaz Skyler White. The "extremists" aren't those who hated her, the extremists are those who live in some warped feminist movement where anything said against a sociopathic monster like Skyler White automatically means you're a misogynist. In otherwords; they live in such delusion and spend all their time on message boards writing heaps of insane shit every day.
Anna Gunn's ridiculous Op-Ed was nothing more than a hilarious attempt to try to fool an audience who do make up the majority (yes, MAJORITY) of fans who hated the control freaking, one-dimensional spaz Skyler White. The "extremists" aren't those who hated her, the extremists are those who live in some warped feminist movement where anything said against a sociopathic monster like Skyler White automatically means you're a misogynist. In otherwords; they live in such delusion and spend all their time on message boards writing heaps of insane shit every day.
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Troll is Pathetic in All Ways
This idiot cannot even grasp the show Breaking Bad, with its subtle nuances. Whatlarks praises a very one-dimensional character like the monster Skyler as some multitude of things while simply dismissing Walter as nothing more than a black and white evil guy who has nothing to offer but a man in a villain role. Whatlarks has not seen Breaking Bad with any common sense let alone watched it with any depth other than to slobber over its unrealistic worship of Skyler who Larks defends at the mere mention that Skyler isn't a saint of some kind.
Whatlarks even claims that because Skyler played a BIMBO that that made her a "strong woman" WTF?
Is Whatlarks for or against misogynist perceptions? That is just fucked up. Woman plays bimbo, so she's so smart and strong! Whoa. Drugs are bad, kiddies. Don't end up like Whatlarks who's no doubt on numerous anti-psychotic pills. That apparently don't work!
Whatlarks ignores all the facts and tries to spin that because Skyler is a female that means she gets to get away with whatever psychotic monster she is, because Walt is a badass. Oooookay. However just because she has a vagina (and a slutty one at that) doesn't mean she isn't any less of a monster.
Skyler, in fact, is the show's biggest monster. I guess Vince Gilligan forgot to write her as a human which he failed miserably at, if he wants to keep insisting that she is the epitome of feminine sainthood. FFS. Ooops Vince Gilligan, you are quite the idiot when it comes to the opposite sex. Your female characters are simply shit. Anna Gunn was the perfect tool for this, though.
Whatlarks is now trolling IMDb to make sure to help cover his ass. Maybe Whatlarks is hoping to get attention from the show's writers? It's really pathetic that the moronic douchebag is spending its life thinking the writers are even interested in the numerous volumes of shit Whatlarks is posting on some internet board.
Whatlarks tries to claim it doesn't like Skyler but the constant jumping to her defense and constant ragging on Walt or anyone who dares dislike Skyler but likes Walt is subjected to the pseudo-intellectual bullshit that Whatlarks oozes with. Whatlarks hatred of Walt is very clear when you realize that this insane troll actually justifies a spouse wishing her husband were dead and calls him every name in the book while going off like a flying raged banshee when someone calls Skyler a "bitch". Which she is, btw.
4 signs of the pseudo-intellectual (pay attention because this is Whatlarks to a T!)
1. Quoting - Whatlarks pulls out old quotes at the drop of a pin and spins them to some twisted hyperbole.
2. Going against common thought without evidence - All the time, the majority of fans hate Skyler but Whatlarks just cannot accept it so naturally the fans are all psychos or misogynists or whatever word it can come up with.
3. Bringing up intellectualism in non-requistite situations - Not only that, but also copies what other fans say when called out on its shit, trying to copycat what someone says about Whatlarks' massive stupidity.
4. Unnecessary use of verbs and adjectives with 4 syllables or more - Wharlarks is Oswald Bates!
It's very clear to even passersby that Whatlarks is crazy, unhinged, and every bit of a control freak as its all time favorite named Skyler. Whom Whatlarks tries to claim it doesn't like Skyler!! REALLY?
So the endless defense of such a monster is just Whatlarks being bored.
And btw, if people were wondering if whatlarks claiming it knows about US Law while being completely ignorant of it, whatlarks is CANADIAN!
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
IP Address: Rogers Cable (174.119.111.251)
Whatlarks even claims that because Skyler played a BIMBO that that made her a "strong woman" WTF?
Is Whatlarks for or against misogynist perceptions? That is just fucked up. Woman plays bimbo, so she's so smart and strong! Whoa. Drugs are bad, kiddies. Don't end up like Whatlarks who's no doubt on numerous anti-psychotic pills. That apparently don't work!
Whatlarks ignores all the facts and tries to spin that because Skyler is a female that means she gets to get away with whatever psychotic monster she is, because Walt is a badass. Oooookay. However just because she has a vagina (and a slutty one at that) doesn't mean she isn't any less of a monster.
Skyler, in fact, is the show's biggest monster. I guess Vince Gilligan forgot to write her as a human which he failed miserably at, if he wants to keep insisting that she is the epitome of feminine sainthood. FFS. Ooops Vince Gilligan, you are quite the idiot when it comes to the opposite sex. Your female characters are simply shit. Anna Gunn was the perfect tool for this, though.
Whatlarks is now trolling IMDb to make sure to help cover his ass. Maybe Whatlarks is hoping to get attention from the show's writers? It's really pathetic that the moronic douchebag is spending its life thinking the writers are even interested in the numerous volumes of shit Whatlarks is posting on some internet board.
Whatlarks tries to claim it doesn't like Skyler but the constant jumping to her defense and constant ragging on Walt or anyone who dares dislike Skyler but likes Walt is subjected to the pseudo-intellectual bullshit that Whatlarks oozes with. Whatlarks hatred of Walt is very clear when you realize that this insane troll actually justifies a spouse wishing her husband were dead and calls him every name in the book while going off like a flying raged banshee when someone calls Skyler a "bitch". Which she is, btw.
4 signs of the pseudo-intellectual (pay attention because this is Whatlarks to a T!)
1. Quoting - Whatlarks pulls out old quotes at the drop of a pin and spins them to some twisted hyperbole.
2. Going against common thought without evidence - All the time, the majority of fans hate Skyler but Whatlarks just cannot accept it so naturally the fans are all psychos or misogynists or whatever word it can come up with.
3. Bringing up intellectualism in non-requistite situations - Not only that, but also copies what other fans say when called out on its shit, trying to copycat what someone says about Whatlarks' massive stupidity.
4. Unnecessary use of verbs and adjectives with 4 syllables or more - Wharlarks is Oswald Bates!
It's very clear to even passersby that Whatlarks is crazy, unhinged, and every bit of a control freak as its all time favorite named Skyler. Whom Whatlarks tries to claim it doesn't like Skyler!! REALLY?
So the endless defense of such a monster is just Whatlarks being bored.
And btw, if people were wondering if whatlarks claiming it knows about US Law while being completely ignorant of it, whatlarks is CANADIAN!
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
IP Address: Rogers Cable (174.119.111.251)
Monday, August 10, 2015
The Repetitious Troll
The mantras that are old, easy to spot, many, many people already put whatlarks on ignore because whatlarks is so easy to detect by the constant trolling method it always uses to fuck around on IMDb.
The same tired old bullshit the psycho uses over and over:
"You're getting emotional" usually right after or right before larks shows how emotionally unstable its-little-self is and goes on long 52-chapter rants. Mostly incoherent and full of spitting rage aimed at Walter and fans of his.
"I don't need the last word because I'm the best" while making sure to reply to every single post with novel-sized bullshit that ends up being a garbled mess of words that are strung together to make it sound intelligent when in reality larks just sounds like a pretentious bigoted cunt. Oh and let's not forget to point out the total arrogance! "I'm the best" yaddah yaddah, shut the fuck up, Larks.
"You don't have any argument" or "You haven't presented an argument" or "You haven't seen the show" when larks can't counter an argument and cannot debate with someone with reason and intelligence those are its responses or any variation of those. Then nobody will bother to argue with a troll like larks because there's no educating the troll. It's a lost cause trying to explain logic or reality to someone who thinks they have a law degree, uses sock accounts to lie about being a law student and lies about its status in society. Lark's a sick motherfucker who enjoys lying on the internet cause it has no life but an ego like a blimp. Larks has Good Year written across its side.
"You haven't watched the show properly!" or "You haven't watched with any attention" This has got to be the most asinine and laughably the big reveal on larks' control freakishness that exposes itself as the moronic tool it really is! It can be translated as "If you don't see the show the way I do, you simply didn't see it. You have to be like me, I have Vince Gilligan quotes at the ready!" Yes, if you didn't watch it from inside the swamp-filled mired mind of Whatlarks and get the same opinion of it that larkie has, then you obviously watched it wrong! LMAO! The old armchair psychologist playing know-it-all on the internet again and being such an obvious troll -- or maybe, scary as it may be, Whatlarks actually believes that its opinion is the only one that can exist! Oh the horrors if people aren't conforming to Larks! You can just see this pathetic loser sitting away up in some isolated little dump, being miserable and thinking its got life all figured out via a TV set.
"OMG you capitalized the word FACT! But there are no facts but mine" then you'll see Larks insert large volumes of nonsense where nothing is actually said but rather to make the other person see a huge wall of text and Larks towering over it with its ass defecating all over the place.
"Just because you stamp your feet doesn't mean it's true" The troll usually says this when what is said is actually true so its retort is a silly accusation about people using their feet on the internet.
"Your post doesn't support the show's main function" or "Your post doesn't support any evidence of (my) interpretation of the show" and "The reason is because it's without basis" or "You can't speak for yourself because you couldn't continue to debate with ME!" and finally after people rightfully abandon any serious discussion with the troll, it goes "You still haven't addressed the counterpoints made earlier" without the slightest inkling that there is no debating with a crazy person! As if Larks ever had any counterpoints. These lines are used by the troll so abundantly that you soon realize its posting from an already written out self-made bible of a deranged fanatic whose obsessive compulsion is to wage a Walt war with anyone who doesn't hate that character. It's even worse when Larks comes across anyone who hates Skyler instead! Then Larks pulls out all the socks, all the rage and all the anger you'd expect to see at a Westboro Baptist Church gathering. For hating Skyler, Larks will do some stalking with some obvious accounts and literally follow you to other boards and sites! You have been warned.
"I WILL NOT BE IGNORED!" usually larks words it like it isn't being ignored when it keeps replying to all those who are ignoring it! They can still see its username replying to them but acts like they are paying attention even if its name is mentioned so that people will know who the ignored troll is, when other normal users randomly mention it's a lowlife troll. Larks tries to turn it around like it isn't being ignored because it is all "I WILL NOT BE IGNORED!" but it is ignored, it's just the people larks harasses with its multiple posts and book sized comments that go nowhere can see it still trying to troll them. This blog is negative attention to Larks but, Larks will take that because it's better than no attention at all! Don't get too used to the attention, troll. Just passing by and being the arbiter.
Other words to looks out for that Whatlarks uses in every_damned_post_every_damned_time.
Nuance.
Finesse.
Psychopath.
Sociopath.
Monster.
Egomaniac.
Manipulative.
Other than the first two words, Larks knows all about those words. Larks will also copy anything you say to it, and try to reuse it on you. Larks is too Lazy to come up with its own comebacks.
Come on, Larks. Be honest with yourself. You're just not being honest with yourself. Dumbass. No matter how much you stomp your foot and demand that Walt is a monster to conveniently make excuses for Skyler being a monster, it just doesn't fly. We know that you've wished people dead, agree with the philosophy that if a woman wants someone killed that it's justified because she's a little fragile woman, and that you spend your pathetic life hating everything Walt (mainly his fans on message boards, endlessly pounding out your rage) so that you can feel better about how much of a monster you are.
Be honest with yourself.
Ah, Whatlarks doesn't get a clue, it doesn't get it and never will.
The same tired old bullshit the psycho uses over and over:
"You're getting emotional" usually right after or right before larks shows how emotionally unstable its-little-self is and goes on long 52-chapter rants. Mostly incoherent and full of spitting rage aimed at Walter and fans of his.
"I don't need the last word because I'm the best" while making sure to reply to every single post with novel-sized bullshit that ends up being a garbled mess of words that are strung together to make it sound intelligent when in reality larks just sounds like a pretentious bigoted cunt. Oh and let's not forget to point out the total arrogance! "I'm the best" yaddah yaddah, shut the fuck up, Larks.
"You don't have any argument" or "You haven't presented an argument" or "You haven't seen the show" when larks can't counter an argument and cannot debate with someone with reason and intelligence those are its responses or any variation of those. Then nobody will bother to argue with a troll like larks because there's no educating the troll. It's a lost cause trying to explain logic or reality to someone who thinks they have a law degree, uses sock accounts to lie about being a law student and lies about its status in society. Lark's a sick motherfucker who enjoys lying on the internet cause it has no life but an ego like a blimp. Larks has Good Year written across its side.
"You haven't watched the show properly!" or "You haven't watched with any attention" This has got to be the most asinine and laughably the big reveal on larks' control freakishness that exposes itself as the moronic tool it really is! It can be translated as "If you don't see the show the way I do, you simply didn't see it. You have to be like me, I have Vince Gilligan quotes at the ready!" Yes, if you didn't watch it from inside the swamp-filled mired mind of Whatlarks and get the same opinion of it that larkie has, then you obviously watched it wrong! LMAO! The old armchair psychologist playing know-it-all on the internet again and being such an obvious troll -- or maybe, scary as it may be, Whatlarks actually believes that its opinion is the only one that can exist! Oh the horrors if people aren't conforming to Larks! You can just see this pathetic loser sitting away up in some isolated little dump, being miserable and thinking its got life all figured out via a TV set.
"OMG you capitalized the word FACT! But there are no facts but mine" then you'll see Larks insert large volumes of nonsense where nothing is actually said but rather to make the other person see a huge wall of text and Larks towering over it with its ass defecating all over the place.
"Just because you stamp your feet doesn't mean it's true" The troll usually says this when what is said is actually true so its retort is a silly accusation about people using their feet on the internet.
"Your post doesn't support the show's main function" or "Your post doesn't support any evidence of (my) interpretation of the show" and "The reason is because it's without basis" or "You can't speak for yourself because you couldn't continue to debate with ME!" and finally after people rightfully abandon any serious discussion with the troll, it goes "You still haven't addressed the counterpoints made earlier" without the slightest inkling that there is no debating with a crazy person! As if Larks ever had any counterpoints. These lines are used by the troll so abundantly that you soon realize its posting from an already written out self-made bible of a deranged fanatic whose obsessive compulsion is to wage a Walt war with anyone who doesn't hate that character. It's even worse when Larks comes across anyone who hates Skyler instead! Then Larks pulls out all the socks, all the rage and all the anger you'd expect to see at a Westboro Baptist Church gathering. For hating Skyler, Larks will do some stalking with some obvious accounts and literally follow you to other boards and sites! You have been warned.
"I WILL NOT BE IGNORED!" usually larks words it like it isn't being ignored when it keeps replying to all those who are ignoring it! They can still see its username replying to them but acts like they are paying attention even if its name is mentioned so that people will know who the ignored troll is, when other normal users randomly mention it's a lowlife troll. Larks tries to turn it around like it isn't being ignored because it is all "I WILL NOT BE IGNORED!" but it is ignored, it's just the people larks harasses with its multiple posts and book sized comments that go nowhere can see it still trying to troll them. This blog is negative attention to Larks but, Larks will take that because it's better than no attention at all! Don't get too used to the attention, troll. Just passing by and being the arbiter.
Other words to looks out for that Whatlarks uses in every_damned_post_every_damned_time.
Nuance.
Finesse.
Psychopath.
Sociopath.
Monster.
Egomaniac.
Manipulative.
Other than the first two words, Larks knows all about those words. Larks will also copy anything you say to it, and try to reuse it on you. Larks is too Lazy to come up with its own comebacks.
Come on, Larks. Be honest with yourself. You're just not being honest with yourself. Dumbass. No matter how much you stomp your foot and demand that Walt is a monster to conveniently make excuses for Skyler being a monster, it just doesn't fly. We know that you've wished people dead, agree with the philosophy that if a woman wants someone killed that it's justified because she's a little fragile woman, and that you spend your pathetic life hating everything Walt (mainly his fans on message boards, endlessly pounding out your rage) so that you can feel better about how much of a monster you are.
Be honest with yourself.
Ah, Whatlarks doesn't get a clue, it doesn't get it and never will.
Friday, August 7, 2015
What People Are Saying!
What they say about what larks on IMDb under the guise of Whatlarks, a big troll with no life.
That poster seems to be a regular on this board. And seems to "study" this show (Rectify) on a level that is well beyond what most casual viewers like myself will take it. As if this show is some kind of spiritual enlightenment for them. So it could also just be a case of an insanely passionate geek/nerd of the show being insanely geeky.
But what is most annoying with many of these posters are the personal attacks and ad hominem style insults. It really adds ZERO value. And they're wrong about their characterization too. Things like "You hate Daniel because you're like Teddy Jr" is just devoid of any logic. If they wanted a serious discussion about the show then they ought to stick to discussing the show instead of lashing out at posters with the personal insults, creating fabrications about posters and throwing out all the ad hominem insults.
Regarding my interchange with whatlark on the Rectify board. I am deeply troubled by his/her reluctance to admit that killing kids is wrong.
Whatlarks is getting pretty annoying with the self-righteousness.
I actually have never been back to that thread since my last post because when I said I was done talking to them, I wasn't kidding. I kind of noticed something wasn't right when they kept changing the subject and bringing up all kinds of weird comparisons out of left field. I'm like damn, I'm not gonna go down this person's rabbit hole, conversations like this never end lol!
People really hate Whatlarks lol. I feel bad for him/her. Probably spent a ridiculous amount of time and money studying some pointless subject in College and couldn't get any kind of job outside of serving Big Macs at the local McDonald's when it was all over and done with, so now she/he takes their anger out on a bunch of people online by burying them in convoluted, pseudo-intellectual nonsense. I'm sensing an inferiority complex. Thanks for the blog. Gave me a good laugh. Now I know not to take any of larks's BS seriously.
The trolling of whatlarks
Board member said in response to that;
I checked it out lol, some shows should really be off-limits for her, it must be tiring to feel outraged all the time, not only by the characters in the shows themselves, but also by posters who happen to like the shows and the characters. After meeting Whatlarks, Skyler doesn't seem so bad after all lol.
The pic is a very good description of whatlarks and how she rattles on with a bunch of words that mean nothing. Just using words to TRY to sound intelligent.
Not another agree with my view or you're a sociopath post.
And this just in! It's so perfect what YellowManReanimated says to the troll HERE!
(of course the TROLL went and reported his thread)
Your interpretation is only that, an interpretation nothing more. One might challenge your interpretation by pointing to the tone of the finale, but of course you've already decided the creators made a mistake by not sticking to your, oh sorry I meant their vision. BRILLIANT! And, thank you.
It seems to me that you use a lot of words to write a great deal of nothing. Oh yeah.
Judging from your posts on this board, you're clearly an elitist with a deluded sense of self importance. Everyone notices that. lol. What's more is that Larks just can't take the responsibility for the crippling flaws in its opinions.
You're also terribly aloof and patronising in the way you communicate. It's utterly unfulfilling for me to attempt to engage what comes across as an emotionally stunted, robotic individual patting her/himself on the back at every opportunity in preening vanity and insecurity./The fact you continue as your own cheerleader, your need for self-reverence here actually makes me feel sorry for you. Well said!
Yeah the guy seems to be both highly sensitive and arrogant to the extent that he can't handle having his opinions challenged and he thinks that his ideas must be the right ones and anyone who disagrees is just wrong/trolling. He turned on me after literally reading one post of mine.
I regard the guy as a clown who deserves to be insulted for his intolerance.
I just don't like the way they (whatlarks and dteam6) think they can call everyone out and throw around their petty insults whilst hypocritically trying to cling to the moral high ground. They're arrogant and need bringing down a peg or two.
I see it as a clown to be honest. Far too self-important to be taken seriously. No real sense of humour unless ridiculing/insulting other people. Weak, fragile ego which is fun to bruise. Nailed it!
And this: Another User Calls Out The Harassing Troll Whatlarks!
There's a reason we call it Whatfarts!
That poster seems to be a regular on this board. And seems to "study" this show (Rectify) on a level that is well beyond what most casual viewers like myself will take it. As if this show is some kind of spiritual enlightenment for them. So it could also just be a case of an insanely passionate geek/nerd of the show being insanely geeky.
But what is most annoying with many of these posters are the personal attacks and ad hominem style insults. It really adds ZERO value. And they're wrong about their characterization too. Things like "You hate Daniel because you're like Teddy Jr" is just devoid of any logic. If they wanted a serious discussion about the show then they ought to stick to discussing the show instead of lashing out at posters with the personal insults, creating fabrications about posters and throwing out all the ad hominem insults.
Regarding my interchange with whatlark on the Rectify board. I am deeply troubled by his/her reluctance to admit that killing kids is wrong.
Whatlarks is getting pretty annoying with the self-righteousness.
I actually have never been back to that thread since my last post because when I said I was done talking to them, I wasn't kidding. I kind of noticed something wasn't right when they kept changing the subject and bringing up all kinds of weird comparisons out of left field. I'm like damn, I'm not gonna go down this person's rabbit hole, conversations like this never end lol!
People really hate Whatlarks lol. I feel bad for him/her. Probably spent a ridiculous amount of time and money studying some pointless subject in College and couldn't get any kind of job outside of serving Big Macs at the local McDonald's when it was all over and done with, so now she/he takes their anger out on a bunch of people online by burying them in convoluted, pseudo-intellectual nonsense. I'm sensing an inferiority complex. Thanks for the blog. Gave me a good laugh. Now I know not to take any of larks's BS seriously.
The trolling of whatlarks
Board member said in response to that;
I checked it out lol, some shows should really be off-limits for her, it must be tiring to feel outraged all the time, not only by the characters in the shows themselves, but also by posters who happen to like the shows and the characters. After meeting Whatlarks, Skyler doesn't seem so bad after all lol.
The pic is a very good description of whatlarks and how she rattles on with a bunch of words that mean nothing. Just using words to TRY to sound intelligent.
Not another agree with my view or you're a sociopath post.
And this just in! It's so perfect what YellowManReanimated says to the troll HERE!
(of course the TROLL went and reported his thread)
Your interpretation is only that, an interpretation nothing more. One might challenge your interpretation by pointing to the tone of the finale, but of course you've already decided the creators made a mistake by not sticking to your, oh sorry I meant their vision. BRILLIANT! And, thank you.
It seems to me that you use a lot of words to write a great deal of nothing. Oh yeah.
Judging from your posts on this board, you're clearly an elitist with a deluded sense of self importance. Everyone notices that. lol. What's more is that Larks just can't take the responsibility for the crippling flaws in its opinions.
You're also terribly aloof and patronising in the way you communicate. It's utterly unfulfilling for me to attempt to engage what comes across as an emotionally stunted, robotic individual patting her/himself on the back at every opportunity in preening vanity and insecurity./The fact you continue as your own cheerleader, your need for self-reverence here actually makes me feel sorry for you. Well said!
Yeah the guy seems to be both highly sensitive and arrogant to the extent that he can't handle having his opinions challenged and he thinks that his ideas must be the right ones and anyone who disagrees is just wrong/trolling. He turned on me after literally reading one post of mine.
I regard the guy as a clown who deserves to be insulted for his intolerance.
I just don't like the way they (whatlarks and dteam6) think they can call everyone out and throw around their petty insults whilst hypocritically trying to cling to the moral high ground. They're arrogant and need bringing down a peg or two.
I see it as a clown to be honest. Far too self-important to be taken seriously. No real sense of humour unless ridiculing/insulting other people. Weak, fragile ego which is fun to bruise. Nailed it!
And this: Another User Calls Out The Harassing Troll Whatlarks!
There's a reason we call it Whatfarts!
Monday, August 3, 2015
Sunday, August 2, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)